Declassified
Central Intelligence Agency documents clearly describe how
international hedge fund mogul George Soros targeted the Soviet
government of Mikhail Gorbachev as early as 1987. Soros, who was already
quite wealthy, worked closely with a CIA-linked non-governmental
organization (NGO), the Institute for East-West Security Studies
(IEWSS), to take advantage of Gorbachev’s policies of «perestroika» and
«glasnost» to infiltrate the Soviet economic and political systems to
hasten their demise.
At
the same time, the IEWSS included as board members Eastern European
Communist government officials who were, by virtue of their positions in
the IEWSS, aiding and abetting the Soros operations to destabilize the
Soviet Union.
Also
ordered out of Russia were the CIA-linked National Endowment for
Democracy, the International Republican Institute, the MacArthur
Foundation and the neo-conservative embedded Freedom House, all of which
maintain close operational and financial links to Soros destabilization
operations.
After
the collapse of the USSR in 1991, Soros and the CIA turned their
attention toward collapsing the Russian Federation by encouraging the
amassing of obscene wealth by unscrupulous oligarchs and encouraging
separatism by autonomous republics and regions of the federation. After
the fall of the Berlin Wall, the New York-based IEWSS changed its name
to the EastWest Institute, which should not be confused with the
East-West Center in Hawaii. However, both operations are heavily tied to
the CIA. Today, the EastWest Institute includes as a board member the
notorious neo-conservative ghoul Michael Chertoff.
The
co-chairmen of the IEWSS in the 1980s were Joseph Nye of Harvard
University and Whitney MacMillan, the chairman and chief executive
officer of Cargill, Inc., a huge agri-business that had trade ties with
the USSR. Cargill states as part of its official history that the «first
business contacts of Cargill with Russia started more than 30 years ago
when the Soviet Union was holding trading operations of selling surplus
grain abroad». In 1972, Cargill sold two million tons of wheat to the
Soviet Union in a direct sales operation. One can see how Soros
opportunistically saw the Soviet Union’s dependence on Cargill for wheat
sales as a potential pressure point on Moscow.
Nye
of Harvard University was the father of «neo-liberalism,» the «liberal»
version of neo-conservatism. Neo-liberal destabilization operations are
part of Soros’s bag of tricks. Nye’s concept of «smart power» has been
embraced by the Obama administration and dovetails with Soros’s use of
social media to foment coups, revolutions, and other undemocratic
changes of governments. Nye was rewarded by Obama with a seat on the
Foreign Policy Advisory Board and the Defense Policy Board. Nye served
as President Bill Clinton’s chairman of the National Intelligence
Council.
In
1987, Nye’s and MacMillan’s special report titled «How Should America
Respond to Gorbachev’s Challenge?» which was held in the CIA files and
not released to the public until 2011, provided a blueprint for future
U.S. relations with Moscow. The IEWSS task force that prepared the
report received funding directly George Soros and the CIA-linked Ford
Foundation. Therefore, with such financial strings attached, the report
unsurprisingly concluded that any re-evaluation of Western relations
with a more open Soviet Union had to be done from a position of strength
rather than with a view toward an equal balance of power. The 1987
IEWSS report states up front that «balancing Soviet power and
maintaining a strong Western alliance remain central to U.S. national
interests». This policy doctrine is the reason why the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) did not dissolve upon the abandonment of its
East bloc counterpart, the Warsaw Pact.
The
IEWSS report urged the West to take advantage of the Soviet scaling
back of its operations in the Third World, the easing of restrictions on
Soviet Jewish emigration to Israel, and Soviet «flexibility» for
eastern European states to pursue their «national interests». In fact,
what this Soros-funded think tank report was calling for was the
replacement of eastern European «national interests» with «NATO
interests». The report also called for granting the Soviet Union
observer status in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) –
the present-day World Trade Organization (WTO) – and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) as a way to obtain openly more information about the
Soviet economy.
The
IEWSS report was designed to outline a «road map» on how Western power
centers – intelligence agencies, banks, multinational corporations, and
the military could take advantage of «perestroika» and «glasnost,» not
in the interests of the Russian and other Soviet peoples, but for the
projection of Western, that is American, interests into central and
eastern Europe.
IEWSS
included on its board such Soros cohorts as Lawrence Eagleburger of
Kissinger Associates, Helmut Sonnenfeldt of the Brookings Institution,
and Peter Tarnoff, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Representing
the communist governments of eastern Europe on the IEWSS board were
Ferenc Esztergályos, Hungarian ambassador to the United Nations; former
Polish People’s Republic ambassador to the UN Ryszard Frelek; Yugoslav
diplomat Ignac Golob who later became Slovenia’s chief liaison with
NATO; and German Democratic Republic (GDR) deputy foreign minister Harry
Ott, who later formed the «Blue Rose» organization of former and
disaffected officials of the GDR.
After
the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Soros and his cronies in the
international «human rights» movements he financed went to work to
dissolve the Russian Federation, a goal they continue to advance. What
Soros wants to achieve is the shrinking of Russia to the old 1553
borders of Muscovy ruled by Ivan the Terrible. To this end, Soros’s
operations in Russia have sought to encourage independence movements in
the Kuzbass region of Siberia; Kaliningrad using German right-wing
revanchists who want to restore Konigsberg and East Prussia, as well as
Lithuanian nationalists; Tatarstan, North Ossetia, Ingushetia; and
Chechnya, using pan-Turanian Turkic nationalists funded by Turkey;
Buryatia; Tuva; Udmurtia; Karelia; Komi; Mari-El; Kalmykia;
Bashkortostan; Sakha-Yakutia; Khakazia; Tyumen; Krasnodar; Stavropol;
Rostov; and other autonomous republics and regions. Even before the
collapse of the Soviet Union, Soros operatives were involved in
fomenting separatism in what were then Autonomous Soviet Socialist
Republics (ASSRs). Chief among the groups co-opted by Soros and his CIA
case officers were the Tatar Public Centre (TOT), which called for
recognition of Tatar sovereignty a year before the USSR’s demise. Other
targets were the Bashkir ASSR, the Chechen‐Ingush ASSR; the ethnic Avars
of the Dagestan ASSR; the Kalmyk ASSR; and the Tuva ASSR.
Today,
Soros, deprived of his NGO offices in Russia, is relying on external
operations on Russia’s periphery to continue to the advance the goal of
restricting Russian rule to Old Muscovy. These bases of operations
include Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Sweden, Moldova,
Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Romania, Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan,
Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Arrayed against Russia are a developing
coalition of Ukrainian fascists and neo-Nazis, Ukrainian and Moldovan
Zionists; Islamic State guerrillas from the battlefields of Syria and
Iraq; Turkish Grey Wolves nationalists and Salafist jihadists; and
Chechen and Caucasus Emirate fighters. The connections between this
growing coalition and the Soros operations, CIA, and NATO should not
only be alarming to Russia but also to Belarus, Armenia, Iran, Syria,
Iraq, Lebanon, Greece, Serbia, and other Slavic and Orthodox Christian
regions.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου